Vol. 01 · No. 04 · Evidence-based peptide research
Peptides.
Simplified.
A plain-English reading of what the peptide literature actually says — reviewed studies, profiled compounds, and an honest edit of what's noise versus signal.
- studies reviewed
- 1,205
- peptides profiled
- 70
- head-to-head comparisons
- 28
- goal categories
- 12
- research briefings
- 78
- cadence
- WKLY
Editorial · Peptide of the Week
04.19.26 · Issue 04
BPC-157: the repair peptide attracting orthopedic research.
A 15-amino-acid fragment of human gastric juice, BPC-157 is the most-cited repair peptide in preclinical literature. Animal models show consistent tendon, ligament, and gut-lining recovery; human trials remain limited. Promising signal, methodologically immature — worth watching, not yet worth overclaiming.
Atlas · Browse by goal
Twelve categories. Seventy compounds. One honest edit.
Matrix · Compare
Compare any two peptides, side by side.
Goal, half-life, typical dose, research maturity — stripped of marketing.
Open the comparator →Dispatches · Stack guides
Three stacks making the case this week.
01Tendons
BPC-157 + TB-500
The repair stack still surfacing in every tendon review.
9 min · Injury Healing→
02GLP-1
Semaglutide + CagriSema
Where GLP-1 stacking went from fringe to standard.
11 min · Fat Loss→
03Focus
Semax + Noopept
The nootropic pair with the most defensible claims.
7 min · Brain & Cognition→
Methods
How we write.
- 01Every claim is tied to a citation. If it isn't, it doesn't ship.
- 02We separate preclinical signal from clinical evidence. Animal work is labeled as such.
- 03No vendor edits our copy. Affiliate relationships are disclosed in the footer.
- 04We update our numbers weekly. The date ticker above is real.